지지씨 기관 회원 가입 안내
경기도내에 위치한 국공사립 문화예술기관, 박물관, 미술관, 공연장 등 도내의
문화예술 소식과 정보를 발행해주실 수 있는 곳이라면 언제든지 환영합니다.
지지씨 기관 회원은 지지씨 콘텐츠를 직접 올려 도민들과 더욱 가까이 소통할 수 있습니다.
기관에서 발행하는 소식지, 사업별 보도자료, 발간도서 등 온라인 게재가 가능하다면 그 어떠한 콘텐츠도 가능합니다.
지지씨를 통해 더 많은 도민에게 기관의 사업과 콘텐츠를 홍보하고, 문화예술 네트워크를 구축하세요.
지지씨 기관 회원으로 제휴를 희망하는 기관은 해당 신청서를 작성하여 메일로 제출바랍니다.
지지씨 기관 회원 혜택
신청서 작성 및 제출안내
경기 문화예술의 모든 것, 지지씨는
기관 회원 분들의 많은 참여를 기다립니다.
지지씨플랫폼 운영 가이드
지지씨는 회원 여러분의 게시물이 모두의 삶을 더욱 아름답게 해 줄 거라 믿습니다. 경기문화재단은 여러분이 작성한 게시물을 소중히 다룰 것입니다.
제1조(목적)
본 가이드는 재단법인 경기문화재단의 ‘온라인 아카이브 플랫폼 지지씨(www.ggc.ggcf.kr. 이하 ‘지지씨’)’의 기관회원(이하 ‘회원’)의 정의 및 권리와 의무를 규정하고, 회원의 생산자료에 관한 기록 저장과 활용에 관한 내용을 규정함을 목적으로 합니다.
제2조(정의)
본 가이드에서 사용하는 용어의 정의는 다음과 같습니다.
① ‘지지씨’는 경기도 소재 문화예술기관의 생산자료 등록과 확산을 위해 경기문화재단이 운영하는 온라인 아카이브 플랫폼입니다.
② ‘회원’이란 소정의 가입 승인 절차를 거쳐 지지씨 글쓰기 계정(ID)을 부여받고, 지지씨에 자료 등록 권한을 부여받은 경기도 소재 문화예술기관 및 유관기관을 의미합니다.
‘생산자료(=콘텐츠)’란 ‘회원’이 지지씨 플랫폼 상에 게재한 부호, 문자, 음성, 음향, 그림, 사진, 동영상, 링크 등으로 구성된 각종 콘텐츠 자체 또는 파일을 말합니다.
제3조(가이드의 게시와 개정)
① 경기문화재단은 본 가이드의 내용을 ‘회원’이 쉽게 알 수 있도록 지지씨 플랫폼의 기관회원 등록 안내 페이지에 게시하여, 자유롭게 내려받아 내용을 확인할 수 있도록 합니다.
② 본 가이드는 경기문화재단의 온라인 플랫폼 운영 정책 및 저작권 등 관련 법규에 따라 개정될 수 있으며, 가이드를 개정, 적용하고자 할 때는 30일 이전에 약관 개정 내용, 사유 등을 '회원'에 전자우편으로 발송, 공지합니다. 단, 법령의 개정 등으로 긴급하게 가이드를 변경할 경우, 효력 발생일 직전에 동일한 방법으로 알려 드립니다.
1. 본 가이드의 개정과 관련하여 이의가 있는 ‘회원’은 탈퇴할 수 있습니다.
2. 경기문화재단의 고지가 있고 난 뒤 효력 발생일까지 어떠한 이의도 제기하지 않았을 경우, 개정된 가이드를 승인한 것으로 간주합니다.
제4조(회원자격 및 가입)
① ‘지지씨’의 ‘회원’은 경기도 소재 문화예술기관과 유관기관으로 합니다. ‘회원’은 글쓰기 계정을 부여받은 후 지지씨에 생산자료를 등록하거나, 게시를 요청할 수 있습니다.
② ‘지지씨’의 가입 신청은 지지씨 누리집에서 가능합니다. 회원가입을 원하는 기관은 계정 신청서를 작성, 가입 신청을 할 수 있습니다.
1. 회원가입을 원하는 기관은 지지씨에서 내려받기 한 ‘온라인 콘텐츠 플랫폼 지지씨 계정 신청서’를 지지씨 공식 전자메일(ggc@ggcf.kr)로 제출, 승인 요청을 합니다.
2. 한 기관에 발급되는 계정은 부서별/사업별로 복수 발급이 가능합니다. 단, 사용자 편의 등을위해 기관 계정 관리자 1인이 복수 계정의 발급을 신청한 경우, 승인 불가합니다.
3. ‘회원’ 계정은 신청인이 속한 기관명/부서명/사업명 등의 한글로 부여됩니다.
4. ‘회원’은 계정 발급 후 최초 로그인 시 비밀번호를 변경합니다.
5. 계정의 비밀번호는 가입 승인된 계정과 일치되는 ‘회원’임을 확인하고, 비밀 보호 등을 위해 ‘회원’이 정한 문자 또는 숫자의 조합을 의미합니다.
③ ‘지지씨’ 가입 신청 방법은 내부 방침에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 가입 신청에 관한 구체적인 내용은 지지씨 누리집에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
④ 경기문화재단은 다음 각호에 해당하는 신청에 대하여 승인 불허 혹은 사후에 계정을 해지할 수 있습니다.
1. 과거 회원자격 상실 회원. 단, 경기문화재단과 회원 재가입 사전 협의, 승인받은 경우는 예외로 함
2. 정보의 허위 기재, 저작권 등 관련 법률을 위반한 저작물 게시 등 제반 규정을 위반한 경우
⑤ ‘회원’은 회원자격 및 지지씨에서 제공하는 혜택 등을 타인에게 양도하거나 대여할 수 없습니다.
⑥ ‘지지씨’는 계정과 생산자료의 효율적인 관리를 위해 〔별표〕에 따라 ‘회원’을 구분합니다. 회원 구분에 따른 이용상의 차이는 없습니다.
제5조(회원 정보의 변경)
① ‘회원’은 언제든지 가입정보의 수정을 요청할 수 있습니다. 기관명, 부서명 등의 변경에 따른 계정 변경도 가능합니다. 단, 계정 변경시에는 계정(신청/변경)신청서를 다시 작성, 제출해야 합니다.
② ‘회원’은 계정 신청 시 기재한 사항이 변경되었을 경우 전자우편 등 기타 방법으로 재단에 대하여 그 변경사항을 알려야 합니다.
③ 제2항의 변경사항을 알리지 않아 발생한 불이익에 대하여 재단은 책임지지 않습니다.
제6조(회원 탈퇴 및 정지‧상실)
① ‘회원’은 지지씨 공식 전자메일, 전화 및 경기문화재단이 정하는 방법으로 탈퇴를 요청할 수 있으며 경기문화재단은 ‘회원’의 요청에 따라 조속히 탈퇴에 필요한 제반 절차를 수행합니다.
② ‘회원’이 탈퇴할 경우, 해당 ‘회원’의 계정 및 가입 시 작성, 제출한 개인정보는 삭제되지만, 탈퇴 이후에도 등록자료는 ‘지지씨’에서 검색, 서비스됩니다.
③ ‘회원’ 탈퇴 후에도 재가입이 가능하며, 탈퇴 전과 동일한 아이디를 부여합니다.
제7조(생산자료의 게시와 활용)
① ‘회원’은 글쓰기페이지(www,ggc.ggcf.kr/ggcplay/login)를 통해 계정의 아이디와 비밀번호를 입력, ‘지지씨’에 접속합니다.
② ‘회원’은 ‘지지씨’ 에디터 프로그램을 활용하여 해당 기관의 문화예술 관련 자료를 게시 및 수정, 삭제할 수 있습니다. 단, 사업의 일몰, 기간의 종료, 추진부서의 변경 등의 사유로 삭제는 불가합니다.
③ ‘회원’은 ‘지지씨’에 게시한 해당기관의 자료를 뉴스레터, SNS 등 온라인 매체로 확산, 활용할 수 있습니다. 단, 타기관의 자료를 사용하는 경우 사전 사용 협의 및 출처를 밝혀야 합니다.
④ ‘회원’의 게시물은 도민 문화향수 확산을 위해 출처를 밝히고 뉴스레터나 SNS 등의 채널에 가공 없이 활용될 수 있습니다.
제8조(회원의 아이디 및 비밀번호의 관리에 대한 의무)
① ‘회원’의 아이디와 비밀번호에 관한 관리책임은 ‘회원’에게 있으며, 이를 제3자에게 제공할 수 없습니다.
② ‘회원’은 아이디 및 비밀번호가 도용되거나 제3자가 사용하고 있음을 인지한 경우, 이를 즉시 경기문화재단에 알리고 재단의 안내를 따라야 합니다.
③ 본조 제2항의 상황에 해당하는 ‘회원’이 경기문화재단에 그 사실을 알리지 않거나, 알린 경우라도 경기문화재단의 안내에 따르지 않아 발생한 불이익에 대하여 경기문화재단은 책임지지 않습니다.
제9조(회원의 개인정보 보호에 대한 의무)
① 경기문화재단은 지지씨 계정 신청시 수집하는 개인정보는 다음과 같습니다.
1. 계정 관리자 이름 2. 사무실 연락처 3. 담당자 전자메일
② ‘회원’의 개인정보는 「개인정보보호법」 및 경기문화재단 개인정보처리방침에 따라 보호됩니다.
③ 경기문화재단 개인정보처리방침은 ‘지지씨’ 누리집 하단에 공개하며, 개정시 그 내용을 ‘회원’의 전자메일로 알립니다.
제10조(사용자 권리 보호)
① ‘회원’의 게시물이 저작권 등에 위배될 경우 경기문화재단은 사전 협의나 통보 없이 바로 삭제조치합니다. 이와 관련한 분쟁은 「저작권법」 및 「공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률」 등을 따릅니다.
② 경기문화재단은 ‘회원’의 게시물이 타인의 권리를 침해하는 내용이거나, 관련 법령을 위배하는 등지지씨의 운영 정책에 부합되지 않는 경우, ‘회원’과 협의 없이 삭제할 수 있습니다.
‘지지씨’의 게시물로 기관의 명예훼손 등 권리침해를 당하셨다면, 경기문화재단 지지씨멤버스의 고객상담(VOC)을 통해 민원을 제기할 수 있습니다. 이는 (사)한국인터넷자율정책기구(KISO)의 정책 규정을 따라 처리될 것입니다.
본 약관은 경기문화재단 대표이사의 승인을 얻은 날부터 시행됩니다.
대분류 | 외부기관 | 경기문화재단 |
---|---|---|
중분류 | 뮤지엄(박물관,미술관)/협회/문화예술공공기관/시군청 담당부서 등 | 본부/기관 |
아이디 | 사업부서명/사업명 | 사업부서명/사업명 |
글쓴이 노출 | 아이디와 동일(한글) | 아이디와 동일(한글) |
콘텐츠 등록/수정 요청
01. 콘텐츠 등록 및 수정 요청서 양식 다운로드
콘텐츠 직접 등록 및 수정이 어려우실 경우, 해당 요청서 양식을 다운로드 하신 후 작성하여
지지씨 관리자에게 등록·수정을 요청해주세요.
02. 콘텐츠 등록 및 수정 요청 안내
상단에서 다운로드하신 해당 요청서 양식 파일을 지지씨 관리자 이메일로 제출해 주세요.
백남준아트센터
When the body and media become one
It was in March 1963 that Nam June Paik found his way to his first solo show Exposition of Music – Electronic Television in Galerie Parnass in Wuppertal. This exhibition is of paramount importance now that it put media artist Paik’s career into orbit in full swing. It is not only because he brought television as an artistic medium for the first time in art history, but because the concepts explored in his practices of performance were consolidated around the two poles of music and television in this exhibition. Architect Rolf Jährling opened Galerie Parnass at his architecture office in 1949 and he organized more than 160 exhibitions and concerts until 1965, particularly Fluxus actions and happenings of the early 1960s. Here is a sketchy glimpse of Manfred Montwé’s photographs of Exposition of Music – Electronic Television.
Fig1. Nam June Paik, Klavier Integral, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig2. Nam June Paik, Klavier Integral, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig3. Klavier Integral demonstrated by Gallerist Rolf Jährling, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
In the central hall of the gallery, there were four pianos displayed, a symbol of classical music, under the title of Klavier Integral. The pianos were, however, prepared in the way they could be ‘played’ in a completely different way. The front cases of two pianos were removed, and their keys and strings were covered with everyday objects, all tangled with electric cables. The objects suspended, stuck and nailed on to the pianos were a doll head, a whistle, a horn, a plume, a spoon, a pile of coins, toy sundries, wires, photographs, a padlock, a brassiere, an accordion, an aphrodisiac, a disjoined arm and lever of a record player, and so on. Visitors were invited to play the piano freely. When the keys were pressed, you could hear a strange sound or see objects moving; or you would find that your action of playing the piano turned on a lamp, a siren, a ventilator or a radio in the room. Another prepared piano of Exposition of Music was called ‘Piano for Arthur Køpcke’ modeled on his Shut Books. As Køpcke made a book that could not be read by gluing its pages, Paik slotted a wooden panel inside the piano and closed the lid so that the keys could not be pressed and the strings did not vibrate.
Fig4. View from entrance into the hall with the Ibach piano destroyed by Joseph Beuys Aktion, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig5. View from entrance into the hall with the Ibach piano destroyed by Joseph Beuys Aktion, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
One of Klavier Integral was an Ibach piano, whose lid and hammer were removed and which was laid down to expose keys and strings. Paik’s intention was to allow viewers to tread or run on it, that is, to play it with their feet. In the opening day, Joseph Beuys showed himself with an ax and swung it all the way to strike the piano in shatters. Nobody had known of this happening beforehand, but Paik remembered that the audience burst into loud applause after the improvisational act. It was said that in order to control the situation, Montwé who was in charge of maintaining the exhibition brought a bucket of water to pour it over Beuys. That piano remained there as it was, and visitors watched the sight of a broken piano or stepped over it. It had been actually obtained, with the help of gallery owner Jährling, directly from the Ibachs, one of the two most notable families in Wuppertal – the other, the Engels. Regarding this old piano, Paik recounted: “If the piano survived today, it would fetch a great price because it was the first piano work of Beuys. We did not have a capability to look ahead to the future and returned the broken piano to the Ibachs. They just throw it away.”(1986)
Fig6. Peter Brötzmann demonstrates Random Access, Strips of audiotape, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig7. Random Access, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
After you passed the section of prepared pianos to ‘play music’ down to the basement, you could encounter a section displaying the instruments to ‘play back music.’ A motor-driven cardboard roller was set on two knee-height props. Fragments of magnetic tapes unwound from a spool were attached on a 50cm-wide segment of fabric moving on the roller like a conveyor belt. Tape fragments were also attached like a city map, on the wall between two sets of fabric conveyor belts. Visitors with a metal tape-head separated from a playback equipment went directly to the point they wanted to scrape to listen to the tape. What resembled electronic sounds varied depending on the speed and direction of scraping. Visitors did not listen to the sounds sequentially played back by a machine but they moved themselves to make a sound at a randomly selected spot; therefore, these works were called Random Access.
Fig8. Visitor at Record Schachlik, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig9. Record Schachlik, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig10. Listening to Music through the Mouth, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
There were also record installations across the basement. Upon the radio having a built-in amplifier and speaker, a record player with a turntable was placed. The elongated axis of the turntable was spinning to which ten vinyl records were randomly skewered. Another similar pile of ten records was connected to it by a rubber belt, thus rotating at the same speed. There were two sets of double skewers, so to speak. Visitors holding a magnetic cartridge were invited to access randomly wherever on the records they wanted. The record pile looked like a skewered kebab, so borrowing the word ‘shashlik,’ this work was entitled Schallplatten Schaschlik. A record on the turntable was also used for another work in a rather intimate way. From an antique record player, a cartridge was removed and instead a phallic-shaped object was mounted. Placing a needle on the record, you would hold the phallic device and listen to the record by feeling its vibrations. This is Listening to Music through the Mouth. According to Montwé’s recollections, Paik asked him to take a special photograph, and in the morning when there was no visitor, Paik tried Listening to Music through the Mouth himself to photograph. He transformed the body part that makes sound, into the one that hears sound, with an erotic connotation added.
Fig11. Paik working on TV set, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig12. Thomas Schmit in the television room, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig13. Nam June Paik's TV, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
His experimental televisions, i.e., the other pole of the exhibition, did not attract much interest at that time, compared with prepared pianos. In an interview, Paik deplored that people’s attention was diverted to an ox’s head, not appreciating the televisions properly – he was talking about the commotion caused by the head of a freshly slaughtered ox hung above the gallery’s entrance, and just before the exhibition’s opening, forced to pull down by the police for health code violations. Although there were little responses from the audience, the experimental televisions were an outcome of Paik’s rigorous research in cooperation with technicians on television circuitry. In the exhibition, some televisions were those which had been completed in advance while others were barely finished after he repeatedly manipulated circuits in front of television sets at the gallery hours and hours in order to gain the images he wanted. The resulting thirteen televisions distorted broadcast signals into each different abstraction, and no single television showed an identical image.
The experimental televisions may be divided into three categories. Firstly, with televisions whose inner circuitry is manipulated to interfere normal workings of signals, the same TV program broadcast is disturbed by negative images, sinusoidal oscillations, and horizontal and vertical stripes. The second group of televisions is connected to external devices by which the audience is led to participate in making images. Step on a pedal switch or make sound in front of a microphone, and the television screen creates dots of light like sparks; a tape recorder and a radio hooked up to television sets feed sound into image responding to the wavelength of the music and the volume of the radio. Thirdly, there are a couple of televisions out of order, which Paik simply brought to the gallery. In one television laid on its side, a single vertical white line runs through the middle of the screen; the other television set lies face-down showing not the screen but its brand name ‘Rembrandt Automatic.’ Montwé recalled that images on the television monitors ran past rapidly, kept changing constantly, or remained unstable so that it was technically hard to capture them photographically.
Fig14. Nam June Paik's Kuba TV, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig15. Flags by Alison Knowles for Paik's Chronicle of a Beautiful Paintress, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Not only clinging to technical experimentation with televisions Paik took much interest in the political aspects of mass media, affecting people’s minds and infiltrating into social dimensions. For example, there was Kuba TV in the exhibition, a television connected to a tape recorder showing different images depending on the frequency of music input. The title implies the Cuban missile crisis, one week of extreme tension between the Soviet Union and the US, caused by Kennedy’s military command to blockade the route to transport Soviet weapons to Cuba. This was a reaction of the Kennedy administration to the Soviet Union’s support of Cuba’s construction of nuclear facilities. Khrushchev eventually scrapped the Cuban plan seeking reconciliation. Alluding to the political affairs that took place only a few months before his exhibition, Paik created a television whose light waves were in sync with sound waves of a recorder. In another part of the exhibition, there was a framed news article of Bild Zeitung dated 16 April 1961, with a headline “War against Fidel Castro, Invasion has Begun.” On both sides of the frame were four stained flags of Germany, Turkey, the UK and Denmark. This is a work of art by Fluxus artist Alison Knowles. Paik wrote a score Chronicle of a Beautiful Paintress dedicated to Knowles, which instructs her to dye national flags with her menstrual blood each month and to display them in the gallery context. Knowles actualized this score and provided the four national flags for Exposition of Music.
Fig16. Paik in the Library with mirrored foil, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Fig17. Paik in the Library with mirrored foil, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Unlike other artists mounting an exhibition at Galerie Parnass, Paik’s Exposition of Music made use of the whole building of the gallery as well as the garden outside. In the gallery’s library Paik installed a work entitled To be Naked and Look at Yourself. This was inspired by Ed Kiënder’s work in which circular forms are cut out of mirrored foil and the fragments are rolled up so that its composition forms a still life on which the surrounding space is reflected. With pieces of mirrored foil in gold, silver and red hung from the ceiling to the floor, some of which were crumpled and wrinkled, Paik encouraged viewers to lock themselves in the library and watch their self-images reflected and distorted on the thin paper. This room contained a fan heater positioned upward so that people could feel the warmth between their legs.
Fig18. Prepared WC, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
Foil fragments were also laid on the floor in the Klavier Integral section, on one of which a violin was placed. In the same vein, mirrors placed in front of some experimental televisions can be construed in terms of inserting self-reflexivity in the space. Furthermore, it was in the gallery’s restroom that another mirror appeared, but it was not the one you could normally encounter around a washbasin. It was Paik’s Prepared W.C. in which he suspended a mirror in front of a toilet and a plaster head upside down above it. If you sat on the toilet, the top of your head would touch that of the plaster, and if you looked at the mirror, you could observe four eyes looking back at you. In his childhood Paik loved to spend hours in the toilet, reading an entire issue of Der Spiegel. He even wrote in his 1965 score Symphony No.5 that “3rd JANUARY, 14.68 to 21.00.08: Read for seven hours Baudelaire’s collected works, on the Prepared W.C. sitting like this genius, here Peter BRÖTZMANN (Federal Republic of Germany) or start on the toilet The Brothers Karamazov (Dostoevsky) to read and only come out again, if you have them!!” Next to these sentences are a photograph of Brötzmann sitting on the toilet of Prepared W.C. in Exposition of Music, and a newspaper clipping of the exhibition review from NRZ Wuppertaler Stadtnachrichten dated 15th March 1963.
Fig19. Portrait Nam June Paik sitting on the staires, 1963, 30.4x40.2cm, B&W photography
Photo by Manfred Montwé © montwéART
As manifested in the title Exposition of Music – Electronic Television, Paik raised questions regarding the relationship between visual and audio media, and this exhibition became a watershed in the pioneering trajectory of his move from an experimental composer to a media artist. Fifty years later now, corporeal perception in communication increasingly involves the whole body with advancing media technology. Considering this change, the conflation of bodily senses that Paik realized in the exhibition speaks volumes. He used originally musical objects to evoke multisensory experiences, and non-musical objects to penetrate the space waiting for the participation of visitors. On the staircase, plastic bottles were placed in disarray, and if stepped on, they would be crushed to make some noise. There were telephones by which visitors could make a phone call or simply a dialog. Even a wall relief was intended to be felt only through the face. The mobilization of the space throughout the gallery in which Paik inserted everyday objects was to conceptualize media as an environment. The meanings of his experimental televisions consist not only in the fact that he modified electronic media artistically but that the televisions were part of the environment in which the viewer’s body resides. Employing everything from electronic circuits to a physical building, Paik constructed a productive space in between music and visual art, and out of the space of (in)commensurability a new form of media art began to emerge.
<ggc의 모든 콘텐츠는 저작권법의 보호를 받습니다.>
Writer - Seong Eun Kim/ An anthropologist specializing in museology and contemporary art, Kim’s areas of research interest include the material and bodily agency of media art and the sensorial dimensions of art museums in performing knowledge. Having worked in Nam June Paik Art Center from 2011 to 2014, Kim is now in charge of education and public programs in Leeum, Samsung Museum of Art.