지지씨 기관 회원 가입 안내
경기도내에 위치한 국공사립 문화예술기관, 박물관, 미술관, 공연장 등 도내의
문화예술 소식과 정보를 발행해주실 수 있는 곳이라면 언제든지 환영합니다.
지지씨 기관 회원은 지지씨 콘텐츠를 직접 올려 도민들과 더욱 가까이 소통할 수 있습니다.
기관에서 발행하는 소식지, 사업별 보도자료, 발간도서 등 온라인 게재가 가능하다면 그 어떠한 콘텐츠도 가능합니다.
지지씨를 통해 더 많은 도민에게 기관의 사업과 콘텐츠를 홍보하고, 문화예술 네트워크를 구축하세요.
지지씨 기관 회원으로 제휴를 희망하는 기관은 해당 신청서를 작성하여 메일로 제출바랍니다.
지지씨 기관 회원 혜택
신청서 작성 및 제출안내
경기 문화예술의 모든 것, 지지씨는
기관 회원 분들의 많은 참여를 기다립니다.
지지씨플랫폼 운영 가이드
지지씨는 회원 여러분의 게시물이 모두의 삶을 더욱 아름답게 해 줄 거라 믿습니다. 경기문화재단은 여러분이 작성한 게시물을 소중히 다룰 것입니다.
제1조(목적)
본 가이드는 재단법인 경기문화재단의 ‘온라인 아카이브 플랫폼 지지씨(www.ggc.ggcf.kr. 이하 ‘지지씨’)’의 기관회원(이하 ‘회원’)의 정의 및 권리와 의무를 규정하고, 회원의 생산자료에 관한 기록 저장과 활용에 관한 내용을 규정함을 목적으로 합니다.
제2조(정의)
본 가이드에서 사용하는 용어의 정의는 다음과 같습니다.
① ‘지지씨’는 경기도 소재 문화예술기관의 생산자료 등록과 확산을 위해 경기문화재단이 운영하는 온라인 아카이브 플랫폼입니다.
② ‘회원’이란 소정의 가입 승인 절차를 거쳐 지지씨 글쓰기 계정(ID)을 부여받고, 지지씨에 자료 등록 권한을 부여받은 경기도 소재 문화예술기관 및 유관기관을 의미합니다.
‘생산자료(=콘텐츠)’란 ‘회원’이 지지씨 플랫폼 상에 게재한 부호, 문자, 음성, 음향, 그림, 사진, 동영상, 링크 등으로 구성된 각종 콘텐츠 자체 또는 파일을 말합니다.
제3조(가이드의 게시와 개정)
① 경기문화재단은 본 가이드의 내용을 ‘회원’이 쉽게 알 수 있도록 지지씨 플랫폼의 기관회원 등록 안내 페이지에 게시하여, 자유롭게 내려받아 내용을 확인할 수 있도록 합니다.
② 본 가이드는 경기문화재단의 온라인 플랫폼 운영 정책 및 저작권 등 관련 법규에 따라 개정될 수 있으며, 가이드를 개정, 적용하고자 할 때는 30일 이전에 약관 개정 내용, 사유 등을 '회원'에 전자우편으로 발송, 공지합니다. 단, 법령의 개정 등으로 긴급하게 가이드를 변경할 경우, 효력 발생일 직전에 동일한 방법으로 알려 드립니다.
1. 본 가이드의 개정과 관련하여 이의가 있는 ‘회원’은 탈퇴할 수 있습니다.
2. 경기문화재단의 고지가 있고 난 뒤 효력 발생일까지 어떠한 이의도 제기하지 않았을 경우, 개정된 가이드를 승인한 것으로 간주합니다.
제4조(회원자격 및 가입)
① ‘지지씨’의 ‘회원’은 경기도 소재 문화예술기관과 유관기관으로 합니다. ‘회원’은 글쓰기 계정을 부여받은 후 지지씨에 생산자료를 등록하거나, 게시를 요청할 수 있습니다.
② ‘지지씨’의 가입 신청은 지지씨 누리집에서 가능합니다. 회원가입을 원하는 기관은 계정 신청서를 작성, 가입 신청을 할 수 있습니다.
1. 회원가입을 원하는 기관은 지지씨에서 내려받기 한 ‘온라인 콘텐츠 플랫폼 지지씨 계정 신청서’를 지지씨 공식 전자메일(ggc@ggcf.kr)로 제출, 승인 요청을 합니다.
2. 한 기관에 발급되는 계정은 부서별/사업별로 복수 발급이 가능합니다. 단, 사용자 편의 등을위해 기관 계정 관리자 1인이 복수 계정의 발급을 신청한 경우, 승인 불가합니다.
3. ‘회원’ 계정은 신청인이 속한 기관명/부서명/사업명 등의 한글로 부여됩니다.
4. ‘회원’은 계정 발급 후 최초 로그인 시 비밀번호를 변경합니다.
5. 계정의 비밀번호는 가입 승인된 계정과 일치되는 ‘회원’임을 확인하고, 비밀 보호 등을 위해 ‘회원’이 정한 문자 또는 숫자의 조합을 의미합니다.
③ ‘지지씨’ 가입 신청 방법은 내부 방침에 따라 변경될 수 있으며, 가입 신청에 관한 구체적인 내용은 지지씨 누리집에서 확인할 수 있습니다.
④ 경기문화재단은 다음 각호에 해당하는 신청에 대하여 승인 불허 혹은 사후에 계정을 해지할 수 있습니다.
1. 과거 회원자격 상실 회원. 단, 경기문화재단과 회원 재가입 사전 협의, 승인받은 경우는 예외로 함
2. 정보의 허위 기재, 저작권 등 관련 법률을 위반한 저작물 게시 등 제반 규정을 위반한 경우
⑤ ‘회원’은 회원자격 및 지지씨에서 제공하는 혜택 등을 타인에게 양도하거나 대여할 수 없습니다.
⑥ ‘지지씨’는 계정과 생산자료의 효율적인 관리를 위해 〔별표〕에 따라 ‘회원’을 구분합니다. 회원 구분에 따른 이용상의 차이는 없습니다.
제5조(회원 정보의 변경)
① ‘회원’은 언제든지 가입정보의 수정을 요청할 수 있습니다. 기관명, 부서명 등의 변경에 따른 계정 변경도 가능합니다. 단, 계정 변경시에는 계정(신청/변경)신청서를 다시 작성, 제출해야 합니다.
② ‘회원’은 계정 신청 시 기재한 사항이 변경되었을 경우 전자우편 등 기타 방법으로 재단에 대하여 그 변경사항을 알려야 합니다.
③ 제2항의 변경사항을 알리지 않아 발생한 불이익에 대하여 재단은 책임지지 않습니다.
제6조(회원 탈퇴 및 정지‧상실)
① ‘회원’은 지지씨 공식 전자메일, 전화 및 경기문화재단이 정하는 방법으로 탈퇴를 요청할 수 있으며 경기문화재단은 ‘회원’의 요청에 따라 조속히 탈퇴에 필요한 제반 절차를 수행합니다.
② ‘회원’이 탈퇴할 경우, 해당 ‘회원’의 계정 및 가입 시 작성, 제출한 개인정보는 삭제되지만, 탈퇴 이후에도 등록자료는 ‘지지씨’에서 검색, 서비스됩니다.
③ ‘회원’ 탈퇴 후에도 재가입이 가능하며, 탈퇴 전과 동일한 아이디를 부여합니다.
제7조(생산자료의 게시와 활용)
① ‘회원’은 글쓰기페이지(www,ggc.ggcf.kr/ggcplay/login)를 통해 계정의 아이디와 비밀번호를 입력, ‘지지씨’에 접속합니다.
② ‘회원’은 ‘지지씨’ 에디터 프로그램을 활용하여 해당 기관의 문화예술 관련 자료를 게시 및 수정, 삭제할 수 있습니다. 단, 사업의 일몰, 기간의 종료, 추진부서의 변경 등의 사유로 삭제는 불가합니다.
③ ‘회원’은 ‘지지씨’에 게시한 해당기관의 자료를 뉴스레터, SNS 등 온라인 매체로 확산, 활용할 수 있습니다. 단, 타기관의 자료를 사용하는 경우 사전 사용 협의 및 출처를 밝혀야 합니다.
④ ‘회원’의 게시물은 도민 문화향수 확산을 위해 출처를 밝히고 뉴스레터나 SNS 등의 채널에 가공 없이 활용될 수 있습니다.
제8조(회원의 아이디 및 비밀번호의 관리에 대한 의무)
① ‘회원’의 아이디와 비밀번호에 관한 관리책임은 ‘회원’에게 있으며, 이를 제3자에게 제공할 수 없습니다.
② ‘회원’은 아이디 및 비밀번호가 도용되거나 제3자가 사용하고 있음을 인지한 경우, 이를 즉시 경기문화재단에 알리고 재단의 안내를 따라야 합니다.
③ 본조 제2항의 상황에 해당하는 ‘회원’이 경기문화재단에 그 사실을 알리지 않거나, 알린 경우라도 경기문화재단의 안내에 따르지 않아 발생한 불이익에 대하여 경기문화재단은 책임지지 않습니다.
제9조(회원의 개인정보 보호에 대한 의무)
① 경기문화재단은 지지씨 계정 신청시 수집하는 개인정보는 다음과 같습니다.
1. 계정 관리자 이름 2. 사무실 연락처 3. 담당자 전자메일
② ‘회원’의 개인정보는 「개인정보보호법」 및 경기문화재단 개인정보처리방침에 따라 보호됩니다.
③ 경기문화재단 개인정보처리방침은 ‘지지씨’ 누리집 하단에 공개하며, 개정시 그 내용을 ‘회원’의 전자메일로 알립니다.
제10조(사용자 권리 보호)
① ‘회원’의 게시물이 저작권 등에 위배될 경우 경기문화재단은 사전 협의나 통보 없이 바로 삭제조치합니다. 이와 관련한 분쟁은 「저작권법」 및 「공공기록물 관리에 관한 법률」 등을 따릅니다.
② 경기문화재단은 ‘회원’의 게시물이 타인의 권리를 침해하는 내용이거나, 관련 법령을 위배하는 등지지씨의 운영 정책에 부합되지 않는 경우, ‘회원’과 협의 없이 삭제할 수 있습니다.
‘지지씨’의 게시물로 기관의 명예훼손 등 권리침해를 당하셨다면, 경기문화재단 지지씨멤버스의 고객상담(VOC)을 통해 민원을 제기할 수 있습니다. 이는 (사)한국인터넷자율정책기구(KISO)의 정책 규정을 따라 처리될 것입니다.
본 약관은 경기문화재단 대표이사의 승인을 얻은 날부터 시행됩니다.
대분류 | 외부기관 | 경기문화재단 |
---|---|---|
중분류 | 뮤지엄(박물관,미술관)/협회/문화예술공공기관/시군청 담당부서 등 | 본부/기관 |
아이디 | 사업부서명/사업명 | 사업부서명/사업명 |
글쓴이 노출 | 아이디와 동일(한글) | 아이디와 동일(한글) |
콘텐츠 등록/수정 요청
01. 콘텐츠 등록 및 수정 요청서 양식 다운로드
콘텐츠 직접 등록 및 수정이 어려우실 경우, 해당 요청서 양식을 다운로드 하신 후 작성하여
지지씨 관리자에게 등록·수정을 요청해주세요.
02. 콘텐츠 등록 및 수정 요청 안내
상단에서 다운로드하신 해당 요청서 양식 파일을 지지씨 관리자 이메일로 제출해 주세요.
경기문화재단
GyeongGi Province’s policy to the Fourth Industrial Revolution
Kim Eun kyung
senior researcher at Gyeonggi Research Institute
1. Introduction
The global financial crisis in 2008 served as an occasion to raise awareness of the importance of manufacturing for the maintenance of a sound economic structure. In fact, Germany and China wasn’t hit by the crisis as hard as other countries because they were strongly supported by their manufacturing industry. In addition, the remarkable development of information and communications technology became an essential tool for the innovation of manufacturing. Germany launched the “Industrie 4.0” in 2011 in an attempt to maximize productivity and efficiency by combining manufacturing and information technology. Since then, other developed countries such as the US, Japan, France and China have also reinforced their efforts to achieve the innovation of manufacturing. The Fourth Industrial Revolution is based on these developed countries’ policy on the innovation of manufacturing. The 2016 World Economic Forum, which clarified the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, defined it as a technological revolution based on the development of artificial intelligence, machine learning, robots, the Internet of things, 3D printing and biotechnology.
Early response to the Fourth Industrial Revolution is an important challenge to be met by the Korean economy whose main axis of competitiveness is its manufacturing industry. In order to maintain and strengthen the Korean manufacturing industry’s competitiveness day by day, the industry needs to systematically prepare for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and to carry out its digital restructuring in order to be revive again as a more efficient and resource-saving industry. Therefore, not only the Korean government but also GyeongGi Province and relevant public institutions should devise a plan to respond to the progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in step with this era of changes and innovation.
2. Ripple Effects of the Fourth Industrial Revolution
It is still questionable if the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a new industrial revolution. In fact, the Fourth Industrial Revolution can be regarded as an extension to the Third Industrial Revolution based on the development of information and communications technology. However, while the past industrial revolutions consisted in processes of replacing human labor with machine and automating labor, the Fourth Industrial Revolution can bee seen as a revolutionary change that replaces humans’ intelligent labor with artificial intelligence. Moreover, in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the convergence of ICT and manufacturing leads to completely automated production and smart systems and to the development of the Internet of things, thus forming a manufacturing ecosystem based on networks. ICT is going beyond production sites to reach all realms of human life including home and cities.
The Fourth Industrial Revolution is expected to accelerate economic growth through the increase of economic efficiency and productivity based on technological innovation. The Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to the establishment of global supply chains based on ICT platforms and to the innovation of products and processes. Consequently, the Revolution will raise productivity by reducing the costs of transport and communication and by improving the efficiency of logistics and global supply chains. In addition, hyperconnectivity of the industrial structure and the superintelligence enabled by big data and AI are expected to form a new industrial ecosystem. The development of technology-based platforms will expand the sharing economy and economy on demand while consumers’ participation, mobile networks and data-based consumption will accelerate not only the innovation of processes and products but also that of business models. Not only office work and some of simple labor but also intelligent labor, which is regarded as requiring advanced technology, can be replaced with AI to result in higher labor productivity. Furthermore, cloud computing and distributed systems can help you reduce your investment in equipment and raise the productivity of capital. In individual service industries, advanced ICT and flexible working can boost productivity. Particularly in service industries, if you use big data to adjust your production activities to changing demand, you can maintain a high rate of operation to increase labor productivity. As consumers use customized services and products, they will also enjoy better usefulness. The progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution will make production much more flexible. Consequently, consumers could make products they want, using a 3D printer at home. They could even supply designs modified by them to the production process making the product they want, in order to get the product fast, at a low price.
Meanwhile, the Fourth Industrial Revolution will lead to the replacement of labor with AI and machine. As a result, the existing demand for labor will decrease. At the same time, demand for new products and services will also lead to increasing demand for new types of labor. It is still not clear which of them will be bigger: the decrease of demand for the existing labor or the increase of demand for the new labor. Many say that the Fourth Industrial Revolution will result in reducing jobs. According to them, most of the current labor will be replaced by AI and robots so jobs will disappear. Moreover, the gap between the small high-income group with advanced technology and the unskilled low-income group is expected to widen. The replacement of jobs with AI and robots could not only reduce jobs but also lead to the collapse of the labor market. In digital society led by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, AI computers, which maintain connectivity and platforms, play an essential role so any labor (whether it be physical labor or intelligent labor) that can be conducted by AI and robots can be replaced by them. With the progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, people could also free themselves from the labor that doesn’t involve humanity (e.g. simple and repetitive work and physically demanding labor) and engage in high-quality services and activities that can be done only by humans (e.g. person-to-person communication, development of cutting-edge technology, the arts and culture). These areas of work are necessarily labor-intensive so they could maintain their jobs. Under these circumstances, if new forward markets for products and services develop and if small businesses make inroads into new markets more easily, technological revolution will be able to make up for the decreasing population and reduce the negative effects of the labor market.
From the perspective of social integration, the Fourth Industrial Revolution could also generate negative impacts by spreading bipolarization throughout society. In fact, the Fourth Industrial Revolution is expected to intensify social bipolarization by worsening inequality in a capitalist society and by reducing the middle-income bracket. That is because the wider gap between “the group with advanced technology and high income” and “the group with simple technology and low income” and bipolarization could result in the collapse of the middle-income bracket. If the gap between the rich and the poor continues to widen and the winner always takes it all, the middle-income group will feel anxiety and inertia, thus leading to a bigger social conflict. Furthermore, a more unstable labor market could worsen the unemployment and poverty of low-income workers, thus raising demand for social welfare. Consequently, the government’s fiscal soundness will worsen, intensifying the conflict among different income brackets over tax and expenditure. Technological revolution could gradually worsen the bipolarization of the labor market. As a result, unskilled workers will have to face more intense competition in the labor market and unstable and temporary work will also continue to increase. The great flexibility and lack of jobs in the labor market will weaken unskilled workers’ bargaining power, thus leading to more temporary work. The bipolarization between large and small businesses will also accelerate and the gap between the developed and developing countries will also widen further.
The success of the Fourth Industrial Revolution requires the government to minimize its role and to become small. Indeed, one of the success indices of the Fourth Industrial Revolution will be a “small government and big market.” To achieve technological innovation, the government should reduce its involvement and regulations regarding the private sector including markets and businesses. Innovation is not something the government can predict and make deliberately. Innovation is full of uncertainties so it is also difficult to achieve concrete results shortly after investment. That is why the government, which is characterized by inflexibility, must not lead technological innovation. Moreover, technological innovation is a process of making a great leap forward so an inflexible administrative system cannot lead innovation. Lastly, leading the Fourth Industrial Revolution needs enormous investment followed by a big investment risk and uncertainties so it is difficult to invest in the Revolution with the government budget.
Therefore, the market is vital to the progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Innovative technologies and businesses should survive through competition in the market. Meanwhile, the government should remove all regulations that limit competition and put a barrier to the market so that businesses can invest and innovate to survive in the market. After all, the government’s role in the Fourth Industrial Revolution is to make laws and systems that contribute to the voluntary and creative energy of entrepreneurs and researchers who develop successful technologies. In addition, the success of the Fourth Industrial Revolution will naturally lead to a smaller role played by the government. That is because technological innovation, which is based on hyperconnectivity and platforms, will reduce the scope of the government’s intervention.
3. GyeongGi Province’s Policy
First, GyeongGi Province needs to participate in the Fourth Industrial Revolution in its own style. In Korea, innovation in manufacturing hasn’t started in earnest because the country’s regulations and application capacity are still not commensurate with its advanced information technology. Like the Korean economy, GyeongGi Province’s local economy is gradually facing lower growth potential. Under these circumstances, new industries with high added value are needed to ensure the sustainable growth of the local economy. More than any other Korean region, GyeongGi Province has developed both manufacturing and IT so the province has the best conditions in the country for innovation in manufacturing with IT. The province should thus transform its manufacturing industry from the existing mass production type (e.g. assembly-based production and machining) into a business model connected to services. Policy support should also be provided to encourage the convergence of manufacturing and service industries.
Second, it is also important to strengthen local R&D capacity in order to facilitate the progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. For the province to carry out R&D fit for the local situation, the central government should allocate its R&D budget in two ways. First, in the case of general R&D, the province should allocate its budget to each project. Second, as for R&D regarding local policy, the central government should support it with Single Pot funding because such R&D activities are regarded as part of local policy. For example, the government needs to provide provinces with a “subsidy for innovation in manufacturing (tentatively named)” in order to support their R&D projects intended to pursue the localization of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The distribution of such a subsidy should be based on each province’s “innovation capacity.” In addition, GyeongGi Province could also consider the establishment of the “GyeongGi R&D Institute (tentatively named)” which will serve as an R&D incubator for local small businesses’ technological innovation. In fact, the province’s current R&D capacity actually means that of its large businesses. In other words, the innovation capacity of the province’s small businesses is almost negligible. The Fourth Industrial Revolution consists in comprehensive innovation and it could widen the existing technological divide. Consequently, the gap and conflict among businesses could grow further. Therefore, the province should help its small businesses not with simple individual policy funds but with systematic and public R&D support.
Third, the province needs a variety of innovative startups and their ecosystem for innovation. To do so, it should invigorate local strategic base of startups. As in the case of La French Tech, Korea should also come up with an innovative public initiative to form a local ecosystem for startups. La French Tech has attracted diverse private participants of startups’ ecosystem including incubators, accelerators and funds. Korea has also implemented diverse policies on support for starting businesses. Nevertheless, most of the policies have been limited to supporting individual businesses and the government still lacks in concrete policy on innovative business creation. It thus needs policy on support for business creation that goes beyond the existing financial support in order to provide technical support and help businesses make innovative business models.
Fourth, GyeongGi Province should move from job creation policy to human resources development policy. The public sector’s role is to nurture human resources that have capabilities that are necessary for the Fourth Industrial Revolution and to help them work in appropriate positions. In response to changes in industry and employment structure brought by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the province urgently needs to retrain the existing human resources from a short-term perspective. In this way, jobs in scientific technology and others that need trained employees will be able to function properly. From a medium and long-term perspective, the province should establish an education system that meets the demand of new industries, reform the content of education and subjects taught at school and train human resources through industry-academia cooperation. The government should play its role of building infrastructure that enables citizens to freely benefit from vocational training and self-directed learning. The country’s education policy should shift its paradigm from school education to lifelong learning. Under these circumstances, GyeongGi Province should cooperate with businesses in implementing concrete policy on the development of human resources in connection with the existing technical training system and polytechnic colleges. This is to enable workers to be retrained and to meet the demand of the Fourth Industrial Revolution.
Fifth, GyeongGi Province could also form a local public-private cooperation body in charge of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. That is because innovation inevitably starts from local areas even if the central government also needs to establish relevant governance bodies. GyeongGi Province should take the lead in ensuring close cooperation among its businesses, scientists and other relevant experts in order to plan and implement the Fourth Industrial Revolution customized to the province.
Sixth, the concrete progress of the Fourth Industrial Revolution requires a concrete reform in the existing system. It is necessary to break away from the regulatory paradigm of the past ara of manufacturing era and move on to a new regulatory paradigm suitable for digital economy. To be more specific, the province should improve regulations on selecting locations such as industrial complexes, redefine the concept of ownership and rights for the development of the sharing economy and reform systems related to economic activities (e.g. innovation in labor regulations in preparation for shorter working hours and for a changing way of working and adjustment of industrial classification for the convergence of industries). The province also needs to reach a social consensus on ethical issues: 1. scope and protection of privacy and 2. human identity in the context of the development of artificial intelligence and biotechnology. Above all, the province should resolutely remove regulations that block the development of new technology and industrialization. In particular, the regulations that are stricter than those of the developed countries need to be abolished promptly.
4. Implications regarding Cultural Policy and Cultural Industries
In Korea, cultural industries tend to be analyzed only from the perspective of consumption, Today, they should be analyzed from the perspective of added value and production. That is because cultural industries will be able to lead the era of technological innovation called the “Fourth Industrial Revolution” and generate high added value. Therefore, cultural policy needs to focus not only on supplying culture as consumable public goods but also on nurturing new cultural industries based on the principles of capitalism and market economy. Indeed, culture may be the only area centered on humans in the era of AI and robots.
First, data-based cultural policy is needed to implement cultural policy customized to demand. Data, which forms the basis of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, is not only utilized in economic sectors but it is also the basic infrastructure of digital society. Thus, the establishment of “digital cultural policy” is urgently needed. To do so, GyeongGi Province should secure budget and professional human resources in order to collect and analyze data on cultural projects by building IT infrastructure. Second, it is necessary to implement policies and projects based on mutual communication with the demand side because technological innovation will personalize and customize the supply of culture. The success of a cultural project will mainly depend on a digital space where the demand and supply sides meet and interact with each other to improve goods and services. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out cultural projects based on a platform where supply and demand meet. Third, the province also needs to expand its cultural realm by nurturing cultural human resources and diversifying projects. It should create and maintain new goods and services in cultural projects through ceaseless innovation. It also needs to create new jobs that could make up for the decrease of jobs caused by the adoption of AI and robots. In particular, it is necessary to strengthen IT training for cultural human resources. Fourth, it is also important to foster cultural industries actively. Generating high added value and contributing to export, cultural industries have the potential to serve as a new driving force for the country’s growth. It is thus necessary to abolish diverse regulations on cultural industries while strengthening support for them. What is also vital is to come up with policy on the improvement of the unfavorable working conditions of those working in cultural industries in order to nurture human resources in these industries. Fifth, it is necessary to nurture startups in cultural industries and devise business models for innovative business creation. The province needs an incubator specializing in cultural industries like France’s CREATIS. Cultural industries require innovative ideas more than any other industry. One of the policies that could support the invigoration and innovation of cultural industries would be to help young entrepreneurs start and run their own cultural startup.
<ggc의 모든 콘텐츠는 저작권법의 보호를 받습니다.>